Legal Opinion

People v. Orr

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 4, 1974No. Crim. 7451PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PARAS, J.

Defendant was charged with grand theft of a bovine animal and assault with a deadly weapon. (Pen. Code, §§ 487, subd. 3; 245, subd. (a).) The jury found him guilty on both offenses and also of using a firearm (a .22 caliber rifle) in connection with the assault. (Pen. Code, § 12022.5.)

On appeal, defendant raises the following three contentions: 1. The evidence was insufficient to support a conviction of grand theft because it was not shown that he took part in the shooting or transporting of the animal.

2. The evidence was insufficient to support a conviction of assault with a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. RedmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. St. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. People v. WadeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. People v. MosquedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. People v. WolcottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. VallergaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. People v. BenjaminCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. People v. BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. People v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API