Legal Opinion

Burgard v. Burgard

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 2013No. 20120285PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Dammon Burgard appeals from the trial court’s default judgment awarding Kira Burgard primary residential responsibility of the parties’ two minor children. We conclude the face of the judgment roll did not contain an irregularity. Therefore, we affirm the default judgment.

I

[¶ 2] On February 15, 2012, Kira Bur-gard sued for divorce and primary residential responsibility of the parties’ two children. On March 7, 2012, the trial court issued an order granting Dammon Bur-gard a thirty-day extension to April 6, 2012, to secure counsel and file an answer. On April 6, 2012,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. City of New York v. Mickalis Pawn Shop, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  2. Ackra Direct Marketing Corp. And Michael Ackerman, Individually v. Fingerhut Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  3. Robert SWAIM, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MOLTAN COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  4. Perdue v. ShermanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Shull v. WalckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Meier v. MeierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Peterson v. JasmankaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Gustafson v. GustafsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Kuntz v. LeissNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Lunde v. PaulsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API