United States v. Olmstead
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above). A submission to search or arrest will not impair the constitutional right (U. S. v. Slusser [D. C.] 270 F. 819; Youman v. Commonwealth, 189 Ky. 152, 224 S. W. 864, 13 A. L. R. 1303; Amos v. U. S., 255 U. S. 313, 41 S. Ct. 266, 65 L. Ed. 654), and courts will not consider the constitutional rights waived by not contesting by force the assumed right of official conduct, nor can a search unlawful at inception, become lawful by what- has been found (Veeder v. U. S., 252 F. 414, 164 C. C. A. 338; U. S. v. Slusser, supra; Garske v. U. S. [C. C. A.] F.[2d] 620).…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Amos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. SullyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
- Taylor v. State of MinnesotaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1972