Legal Opinion

Few v. Hilsman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 31, 1916No. 6979PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Certiorari; from Morgan superior court — Judge Park. October 17, 1915.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.

1. Any promise to answer for the debt, default, or miscarriage of another, to be binding on the promisor, must be in writing. Civil Code, § 3222. Considering only the evidence in behalf of the plaintiff, the testimony was insufficient to show a novation by which the defendant was substituted for the plaintiff’s debtor and that the plaintiff accepted him in lieu of the original debtor; for there was no testimony that the plaintiff agreed to release the original debtor, but, on the contrary, the original debtor was one of the defendants in this ease. An oral promise to pay the debt of another…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Butler v. GodleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  2. Cowart v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  3. Loftis Plumbing & Heating Co. v. American Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  4. Didschuneit v. Enochs Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  5. Alexander v. Duffee-Freeman Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API