Legal Opinion

Diamond v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided June 7, 1935No. A-8809PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court, Oklahoma county, of forgery in the second degree and was sentenced to a term of five years in the state penitentiary. The appeal is by transcript. The information in substance alleges that defendant “ * * * did then and there, willfully, unlawfully, wrongfully, knowingly and feloniously forge a certain pecuniary demand and obligation, being and purporting to be the act of another person, to wit, Morton R. Harrison, which is in words and figures as follows, to wit: (Here is set out a combined claim of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re NowakCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. McGarrah v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Viers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Fullingim v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Ex Parte KellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Boyer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Moss v. ArnoldCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Diamond v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API