Diamond v. State

This is a companion case to- No. A-8809, 57 Okla. Cr. 214, 46 Pac. (2d) 966, just decided, involving the same defendant and the same charge except for a different transaction. The same questions are raised, and plaintiff in error’s brief differing from that filed in A-8809 only in referring to page numbers of the record; the state’s brief setting, up no additional matter and referring to its former brief.

Under the rule there laid down, the case is affirmed.