Legal Opinion
U-Haul International, Inc. v. Estate of Albright
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 22, 2010No. 07-16482PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Nathan Albright and Steven Wamser acted as counsel for the National Labor Relations Board in an action against U-Haul. U-Haul sued Albright and Warnser, alleging that they improperly obtained privileged information and used it against U-Haul during the proceedings. The United States Attorney for Nevada certified under the Westfall Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2679(d), that Wamser was acting within the course and scope of his employment at the time of the alleged conduct. Accordingly, the United States Attorney filed a notice of removal and sought to substitute the United States as the defendant…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Gutierrez De Martinez v. LamagnoSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Shui King Tam Wong, Gong Yuen Wong, Wing Sun Wong v. Griffin B. Bell, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Green v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Blair G. McLachlan v. James Bell Michael George Charles Smith, OpinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Billings v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- Magowan v. LoweryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Steele v. MeyerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Oliver v. MihelicDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
- Taylor v. HaleDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2012
- Treasure Island Former and Current Residents v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.