Treasure Island Former and Current Residents v. United States of America

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TREASURE ISLAND FORMER AND Case No. 20-cv-01328-JD CURRENT RESIDENTS, et al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER AND NOTICE TO 9 PLAINTIFFS RE DISMISSAL v. 10 TREASURE ISLAND DEVELOPMENT 11 AUTHORITY, et al., Defendants. 12 13 14 The Court dismissed plaintiffs’ prior amended complaint because plaintiffs’ allegations 15 were “so vague and perfunctory that they give defendants ‘little idea where to begin’ in preparing 16 a response.” Dkt. No. 49 at 2 (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 565 n.10 17 (2007)). Plaintiffs…