Legal Opinion

Holland v. Byers Drilling Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 21, 1933No. 24593PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CULLISON, Y. C. J.

This is an original proceeding in this court to review an order of the State Industrial Commission made and entered on the 15th day of Starch, 1933, wherein the petitioner, George Holland, was denied compensation for an injury arising out of and in the course of his employment with the respondent Carl Followill.

The record shows that on April 19, 1932, claimant filed a claim with the Commission, alleging that on April 2, 1932, while working as an employee of Carl Followill, he received a back injury. Said claimant made the following parties corespondents: Byers Drilling…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gypsy Oil Co. v. KeysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Brinks Express Co. v. FosterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Followwill v. MarshallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Adams Union Truck Terminal v. KeeshenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Followill v. MarshallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Veazey Drug Co. v. BruzaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Consolidated Motor Freight Terminal v. VineyardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  3. Colvin v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Stilwell v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Flanagan v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API