Legal Opinion

Ericson v. Federal Express Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 14, 2008No. D049934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McCONNELL, P. J.

In this premises liability action, Matthew A. Ericson, who substituted into this appeal after the death of his brother, plaintiff Mark Ericson, 1 appeals a summary judgment for defendants, Federal Express Corporation (Federal Express) and FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (FedEx Ground). 2 Ericson contends the court erred by determining FedEx had no duty to protect Mark against a third party assault and robbery in its parking lot, based on the lack of prior similar criminal conduct on the premises or other evidence the assault was reasonably foreseeable. Ericson also…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. JERRETT WILLIAMS GRAHAM, Individually and as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF RAJAH MALIK GRAHAM v. ORLANDO LODGE NO. 1079, BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. D/B/A ORLANDO FLORIDA ELKS LODGE 1079, and TAJH WILLIAMS, IndividuallyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026
  3. Jacobs v. Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage Co.California Court of Appeal · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API