Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sanchez v. City of Espanola

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 1980No. 4055Published

1DissentSutin, Judge

I dissent.

Plaintiffs below, who are not involved in this appeal, recovered judgment against defendant, City of Española, and defendant, Aalco Manufacturing Company, for damages suffered as the result of a defective volleyball net support. The City of Española appeals from a “cross-claim” judgment in which the court ordered that the City on the one hand, and Aalco and Tiano’s Sporting Goods Store, Inc., treated as a single entity, on the other hand, should share equally the common liability and should each pay one-half of the judgment in favor of plaintiffs.

On Appeal, the City claims it is…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Dole v. Dow Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Rogers v. Dorchester AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Bristol-Myers Co. v. GonzalesTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Stuart v. Hertz Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
  5. Farr v. Armstrong Rubber CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API