Legal Opinion
In the Interest of C.P.J.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided August 4, 2003No. 05-02-01639-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice LANG.
This is an appeal from the trial court’s order modifying an existing agreed visitation order between Marshall M. Jackson and his former parents-in-law Ronnie and Cheryl Adams, the appellees. The agreement allowed the Adamses scheduled visitation of their grandchildren, C.P.J. and S.B.J., Jackson’s two minor children. In two issues, Jackson argues (1) the trial court’s order amending the previous visitation schedule infringes on his fundamental right to direct the care, custody, and control of his children; and (2) he is entitled to request termination of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- General Services Commission v. Little-Tex Insulation Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Noell v. City of CarrolltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Texas Department of Insurance, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
- In re C.T.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2012
- In the Interest of L.B., a Child v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2024
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, and Liberty Insurance Corporation v. Texas Department of Insurance and Jose Montemayor, as Commissioner of Insurance Amber, Inc., Champagne-Webber, Inc. Churchill Truck Lines, Inc. And Royal Seating Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.