Legal Opinion

Jenkens & Gilchrist v. Riggs

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided September 17, 2002No. 05-02-00183-CVPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion By

Justice KINKEADE.

Jenkens & Gilchrist, Paul C. Watler, and Timothy J. Goodwin (collectively referred to as “Jenkens”) bring an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s denial of their motion to compel arbitration. In their interlocutory appeal, Jenkens raises two issues: (1) whether the Texas General Arbitration Act applies to this lawsuit; and (2) whether the arbitration agreement at issue requires arbitration of this lawsuit. Jenk-ens also brings a petition for writ of mandamus presenting two similar issues: (1) whether the Federal Arbitration Act applies to this lawsuit;…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Myers v. Gulf Coast Minerals Management Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Cantella & Co., Inc. v. GoodwinTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Employers Casualty Company v. TilleyTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Lyons v. MontgomeryTexas Supreme Court · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. WebsterTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Pratt-Shaw v. Pilgrim's Pride Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004
  3. in Re Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, Orpheus Holdings LLC, Stellar Funding Ltd., and Orpheus Funding LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
  4. Wachovia Securities, LLC v. Mims, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
  5. Aslam Virani v. Pat Cunningham, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API