Heimstadt v. Tapered Parts, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.
The present action was for the foreclosure of a chattel mortgage in which judgment of foreclosure was decreed. Defendant appeals from a portion of the judgment which it is claimed was in excess of the amount due. The contention is that a tender was made of the amount due which was sufficient to stop the running of the interest obligation and to save the defendant the costs of suit.
The note provided: “Should an attorney be employed to procure payment hereof by suit or otherwise, the undersigned, jointly and severally, agree to pay a reasonable sum as attorney’s fees therefor.” On February 14,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Holland v. PaddockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hunt v. SmythCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Gray1 CPB, LLC v. SCC Acquisitions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Still v. Plaza Marina Commercial Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Gaffney v. Downey Savings & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1988
- Thomassen v. CarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.