Legal Opinion

Holland v. Paddock

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 26, 1956No. Civ. 21419PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.

This is an appeal from a single judgment rendered in two cases involving substantially the same facts, the cases having been consolidated for trial by order of the court upon stipulation of the parties.

Apparently the parties hereto had, for several years, been close personal friends engaging in social activities together and Kenneth Holland had also been employed by Beth Paddock as her attorney.

A fair résumé of the facts is hereinafter set forth. In December, 1950, Beth Paddock called Kenneth Holland in Beverly Hills from her home in Palm Springs and asked him to represent a friend of hers…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Kinsel v. BallouCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lovetro v. SteersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Still v. Plaza Marina Commercial Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Heimstadt v. Tapered Parts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. JW Gaming Development, LLC v. JamesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
  5. Piedmont Capital Management v. McElfishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API