Legal Opinion

Cody Realty & Mortgage Co. v. City of Winston-Salem

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 3, 1940PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

Tbe facts supporting plaintiff’s claim were admitted by written stipulation, and tbe defendant rested its defense solely on want of power to enter into tbe contract and to pay for tbe services rendered.

The plaintiff, a corporation, is engaged in the real estate business in Forsyth. County. Tbe city of Winston-Salem, owning certain city lots which, it had acquired at tax and street assessment foreclosure sales, advertised the property for sale at public auction. In order to obtain at such sale an amount equal to its taxes and costs of sale and to dispose of property which it had been compelled…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bridgeman v. City of DerbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  2. Adams v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Smith v. City of NewbernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  4. City of Asheville v. HerbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Kennerly v. Town of DallasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Green v. . KitchinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Harrison v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Green v. . KitchinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API