Harrison v. . Brown
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.
The plaintiff was permitted by order of court to institute an independent action against the receiver to determine the validity of his claim. McIntosh, p. 1011. A jury trial having been waived, the trial judge could have found the facts with the force and effect of a jury verdict, and declared his conclusions of law arising thereon. The statute requires that when issues of fact are tried by the judge the decisions shall contain a statement of the facts found and conclusions of law separately. C. S., 569; McIntosh, p. 553; Dailey v. Ins. Co., 208 N. C., 817, 182 S. E., 332. Here, however, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. . Carolina BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- State v. . WhitehurstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Raleigh Real Estate & Trust Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- House v. . AbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Dailey v. Washington National InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Shearin v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Jones v. Palace Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Helms v. ReaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Beasley-Kelso Associates, Inc. v. TenneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Ingram v. All American Assurance Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.