People v. Wilson
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge CASEBOLT.
In this posteonvietion proceeding, the primary issue is whether the federal constitution, as interpreted in Indiana v. Edwards, 554 U.S. 164, 128 S.Ct. 2379, 171 L.Ed.2d 345 (2008), requires state trial courts to employ a particular test to determine a defendant’s mental competency to waive counsel and represent himself at trial or, instead, courts need only determine mental competency to stand trial under the standards set forth in *1092Godinez v. Moran, 509 U.S. 389, 396, 113 S.Ct. 2680, 125 L.Ed.2d 321 (1993). We reject the contention of defendant, Douglas Eugene…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Indiana v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- v. HunsakerColorado Court of Appeals · 2020
- People v. MartinColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- Wilson v. People Beaty v, PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
- Bane v. AmazonColorado Court of Appeals · 2021
- Peo v. CookColorado Court of Appeals · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.