Legal Opinion

Diaz v. Carcamo

California Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 2011No. S181627PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

A person injured by someone driving a car in the course of employment may sue not only the driver but that driver’s employer. The employer can be sued on two legal theories based on tort principles: respondeat superior and negligent entrustment. Respondeat superior, a form of vicarious liability, makes an employer liable, irrespective of fault, for negligent driving by its employee in the scope of employment. The theory of negligent entrustment makes an employer liable for its own negligence in choosing an employee to drive a vehicle.

If, as here, a plaintiff asserts both…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Knight v. JewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. C.A. v. William S. Hart Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Ferrer v. OkbamicaelSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  3. Markow v. RosnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. QUYNN v. HULSEYSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
  5. Bogdanski v. BudzikWyoming Supreme Court · 2018

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API