Legal Opinion

McMechan v. Yenter

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1922No. 14368PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Writ or Error to the Circuit Court of Adams county; the Hon. Albert Akers, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thompson

October 12, 1916, plaintiffs in error filed their bill in the circuit court of Adams county against W. E. Yenter, Daniel Graham and Thomas B. Smith, alleging that defendants in error had constructed a tile drain across a road that was then and for more than thirty years had been open to public travel, thereby throwing upon the lands of plaintiffs in error surface waters which would not naturally have flowed upon said lands, and that their lands were greatly damaged by the construction and maintenance of the tile drain. They prayed for a mandatory injunction requiring the removal of the drain.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Minnesota v. Northern Securities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Prentice v. KimballIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Highway Commissioners of Rutland v. Highway Commissioners of DaytonIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Knopf v. Chicago Real Estate BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Knopf v. First National Bank of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Oglesby v. Springfield Marine BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Georgeoff v. SpencerIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Langson v. GoldbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  4. McCreery v. BartholfIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Wayne Township Board of Auditors v. LudwigAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API