Highway Commissioners of Rutland v. Highway Commissioners of Dayton
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the County Court of LaSalle county; the Hon. Charles H. Gi'lmaN, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walker
This was an action on the case, brought by appellees in the county court of LaSalle county, against appellants. It appears that the towns of Dayton and Rutland are organized under the township law, and are adjoining; that they are divided by Fox river; that a highway, leading in a northerly direction through these towns, crosses the river at the village of Dayton; that, in 1853, a bridge was built across the river at that point, which became a part of the highway, and was used for public travel by the people generally. It is claimed by appellees that the bridge became a public bridge which…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Commissioners of Highways of the Town of Geneseo v. HarperIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
- Commissioners of Highways of the Town of Lyons v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
3Cited by19 opinions
- Mayor, Etc., of N.Y. v. . SEC. Ave. R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- McMechan v. YenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
- Fairbury Union Agricultural Board v. HollyIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- People ex rel. Corey v. Comrs. of HighwaysIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Mayor v. Second Avenue RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.