Henry Prentiss & Co. v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
CAFFEY, District Judge.
Though the action was tried last Febru* ary, it was not argued or submitted until the 23d instant. As explained to counsel, it is essential that I dispose of it this week, before leaving on vacation. After I resume sitting in September, my time will be absorbed by new matters. Accordingly, without attempting a full exposition of the grounds, the points, involved are determined as follows:
1. If the excess of actual value of the real estate over the figures entered in the books and balance sheets had been claimed in the returns for 1918 and 1920, the taxpayer would have…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Doyle v. Mitchell Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Rock Island, Arkansas & Louisiana Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Tucker v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Fox v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Porter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lucker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
- City Bank Farmers' Trust Co. v. BowersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1932
- Freeport Texas Co. v. BowersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1934
- Smith v. DeanDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1931