Legal Opinion

Maher v. Voss

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided June 11, 1953No. 5PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Southerland, C. J.;

The hriefs and argument on this appeal involving an action to recover damages for negligence, bring before us two questions :

1. Did the evidence justify a finding of contributory negligence as a matter of law?

2. Was there sufficient evidence to go to the jury on the issue of defendants’ negligence?

We shall refer to plaintiffs below, appellants, as “plaintiffs”; to defendants below, appellees, as “defendants”; and to Mrs. Anne Maher as “plaintiff”.

Before taking up the merits, a motion to dismiss the appeal requires consideration. Final judgment for the defendants was entered…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Trowell v. Diamond Supply Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  2. Trowell v. Diamond Supply Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1952
  3. Maher v. VossSuperior Court of Delaware · 1951
  4. Reardon v. Exchange Furniture Store, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1936
  5. French v. JeffriesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Goldman v. TorresTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. W. S. Fowler Rental Equipment Company v. SkipperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  3. Delmarva Power & Light v. StoutSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
  4. Frelick v. Homeopathic Hospital Ass'n of DelawareSuperior Court of Delaware · 1959
  5. Fahey v. SayerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API