Reardon v. Exchange Furniture Store, Inc.

Speakman, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

In this case the plaintiff in error contends that:

The relationship of the plaintiff in error with the defendant in error was that of an independent contractor, and therefore the plaintiff in error was an invitee upon the premises, for the purpose of doing the work for which he was engaged. The court is in full accord with this contention of the plaintiff in error, and the correctness thereof is conceded by the defendant in error.

The plaintiff in error next contends that:

The defendant in error owed to the plaintiff in error the duty to exercise…