Legal Opinion

McVicker v. Kuronen

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1953No. 2582PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Harnsberger, Justice.

By direct appeal from the District Court’s judgment-finding generally for the plaintiff and against the defendant upon all issues except plaintiff’s claim for damages for loss of use of his truck — the defendant-appellant assigns as error — (1) receiving evidence of custom; (2) refusing the testimony of defendant as to value of plaintiff’s truck; (3) that the judgment is not sustained by evidence; and, (4), that the judgment was contrary to law.

Appellant having conceded that failure to make offer of proof when defendant’s testimony as to value of plaintiff’s truck…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. May v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Ries v. Cheyenne Cab & Transfer Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Elswick v. Charleston Transit Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. State Ex Rel. Nagle v. StaffordMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Dulaney v. JensenWyoming Supreme Court · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Danculovich v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Cervelli v. GravesWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  3. American Smelting & Refining Co. v. WusichArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Phelan v. Read Construction CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Charles Bunning v. Ernest RomeroWyoming Supreme Court · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API