Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Nagle v. Stafford

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1934No. 7,296PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion:

2Per curiam

This is a quo warranto proceeding brought by the Attorney General against A. E. Stafford and A. P. Bruce, who severally claim the office of Commissioner of Agriculture, Labor and Industry.

Section 1 of Article XVIII of the Constitution of Montana provides: “The legislative assembly may provide for a bureau of agriculture, labor and industry, to be located at the capital and be under the control of a commissioner appointed by the governor subject to the confirmation of the senate. The commissioner shall hold his office for four years, and until his successor is appointed and qualified;…

3Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Englestien v. MintzIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Byrne v. DrainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. State ex rel. Tredway v. LuskSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853
  4. Brady v. HoweMississippi Supreme Court · 1874
  5. State ex inf. Major ex rel. Sikes v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by25 opinions

  1. May v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Johnston v. LanducciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. McCall v. CullArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  4. General Agriculture Corporation v. MooreMontana Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State Ex Rel. Matson v. O'HernMontana Supreme Court · 1937

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API