Legal Opinion
In Re Marriage of Murga
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 18, 1980No. 21113PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
103 Cal.App.3d 498 (1980)
163 Cal. Rptr. 79
In re the Marriage of JANICE LEE and ANTHONY R. MURGA.
ANTHONY R. MURGA, Respondent,
v.
JANICE LEE MURGA PETERSEN, Appellant.
Docket No. 21113.
Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.
March 18, 1980.
COUNSEL
D. Dian Hixon for Appellant.
Roger R. Meadows for Respondent.
OPINION
KAUFMAN, Acting P.J.
Janice Lee (Murga) Petersen (mother) appeals from an order modifying the child visitation provisions in the interlocutory and final judgments dissolving the marriage of the parties.
At the time of the dissolution, in December 1974, custody of Brian…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Munoz v. MunozWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Stack v. StackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Sanchez v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Boerger v. BoergerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Cory v. CoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Elk Grove Unified School District v. NewdowSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- In Re Marriage of BurgessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Felton v. FeltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Rolde v. RoldeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
- Zummo v. ZummoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.