Legal Opinion

Boerger v. Boerger

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 15, 1953PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

26 N.J. Super. 90 (1953)

97 A.2d 419

GERTRUDE L. BOERGER, PLAINTIFF,

v.

HARRY E. BOERGER, JR., DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided May 15, 1953.

Mr. Charles M. Grosman, attorney for plaintiff.

Mr. Thomas J. Holleran, attorney for defendant.

GOLDMANN, J.S.C.

The issue presented for determination is the future religious training and upbringing of the two children of the parties, now divorced. A review of past events will provide the setting for the present controversy.

Plaintiff was baptized in the Zion Evangelical and Reformed Church, a Newark, N.J. Lutheran congregation,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Purinton v. JamrockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  2. Callen v. GillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  3. People Ex Rel. Sisson v. SissonNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. Hernandez v. ThomasSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
  5. Richards v. CollinsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1889

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Pascale v. PascaleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Felton v. FeltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Lynch v. UhlenhoppSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  4. Sheehan v. SheehanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  5. In Re Marriage of MurgaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API