Legal Opinion

Fox v. Employment Department

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 12, 2014No. 13AB0829, 13AB0830; A154624PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.

On judicial review of an order of the Employment Appeals Board (the EAB), claimant challenges her disqualification from receipt of unemployment insurance benefits based on a discharge from her employment for misconduct, ORS 657.176(2)(a). The EAB set aside the decision of the administrative law judge (ALJ) allowing benefits. Because the EAB did not consider claimant’s intent in regard to the incident leading to her termination, and the incident could be an isolated instance of poor judgment and not disqualifying misconduct, the EAB’s order lacked substantial reason, and we reverse.

We take the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Drew v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Babcock v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. Freeman v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. Smithee v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. Thomas v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Isayeva v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API