(PC) Hearns v. Cisnero
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CLARENCE L. HEARNS, Case No.: 1:22-cv-1033-JLT-CDB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO 13 v. DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM 14 CISNERO, et al., (Doc. 29) 15 Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 16 17 18 Plaintiff Clarence L. Hearns is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 19 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 21 Plaintiff initiated this action with the filing of his original complaint on August 16, 2022. 22 (Doc. 1.) That same…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.