Legal Opinion

Van Horn v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1956No. Civ. 16668PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AGEE, J. pro tem. *

This is an action for damages brought by an injured employee against his employer, Southern Pacific Company, under the provisions of the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq.). Plaintiff was a yard clerk whose duties required him to go into the railroad yards, walk beside the trains and take the numbers from incoming and outgoing cars. Although he had worked for Southern Pacific as a yard clerk for about seven months, the day of the accident, January 8, 1953, was the first day that he had been assigned to work in Richmond. His previous work had been in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Showalter v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Caminetti v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Diller v. Northern California Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Lane v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Moore v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1980
  2. Bruce v. UlleryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Skyways Aircraft Ferrying Service, Inc. v. StantonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Holweger v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  5. Gallois v. West End Chemical Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API