McDermott v. Hughley
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
COLE, Judge.
The basic question presented in this case is whether the reports of a mental health care professional, requested by an employer and bearing on the fitness of an employee for employment, enjoy the defense of an absolute or qualified privilege in a defamation suit. If an absolute or qualified privilege pertains, then the trial court was correct in granting summary judgment. If no such defense is available, then the trial judge erred and a trial must be conducted.
The characters giving rise to this issue we introduce in the following recitation of facts. David Eugene Hughley applied…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gonzales v. Xerox Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- Jacron Sales Co. v. SindorfCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Bass v. Nooney Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Berkey v. DeliaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Bagwell v. Peninsula Regional Medical CenterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Caldor, Inc. v. BowdenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Shapiro v. MassengillCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Smith v. DanielczykCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Rosenberg v. HelinskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.