Legal Opinion
Muehlstedt v. City of Lino Lakes
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 5, 1991No. C2-90-2317, C7-90-2717, C4-90-2321 and C6-90-2725PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.
FACTS
Respondent Kenneth Muehlstedt sued for damages incurred from the removal and burial of trees on his property in the course of construction of a public road. In November 1988, the jury found for Muehls-tedt and awarded him compensatory and punitive damages. Appellants moved for a new trial. By order on May 9, 1989, the trial court denied the motion for a new trial on all issues, but granted a new trial on damages unless Muehlstedt accepted a re-mittitur. Muehlstedt declined the remit-titur and the second trial, on damages alone, was held in April…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brown v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Emme v. C.O.M.B., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Schaust v. TOWN BD. OF HOLLYWOOD TP., CARVER CTY.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- In Re the Commodore Hotel Fire & Explosion CaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Marty v. NordbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bains v. Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Hackett v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993