Legal Opinion
Bains v. Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 23, 1993No. C4-92-1593PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Appellant Herman H. Bains brought an action against respondents Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood Incorporated (“PJH”) and its registered representative and branch manager Charles Duddingston, seeking return of a $5,626.07 contribution made into appellant’s self-directed Keogh plan, asserting that no transfer of securities occurred and the contract for the sale of securities was unenforceable under Article 8 of the Uniform Commercial Code. The trial court determined that the securities transaction involved 375 shares of uncertificated Western Union stock, the transfer of which…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Specialized Tours, Inc. v. HagenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Jack Frost, Inc. v. Engineered Building Components Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Tonka Tours, Inc. v. ChadimaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Northern States Power Co. v. Lyon Food Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cambron v. MoyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. M.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Prudential Securities, Inc. v. Bender, No. Cv94-0368187s (Aug. 18, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998