Legal Opinion

Peco Energy Co. v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 26, 2007No. 73 MAP 2004PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice BALDWIN.

This case involves the computation of tax under the Public Utility Realty Tax Act (“PURTA”) (72 Pa.C.S. §§ 8101-A-8109-A) 1 for PECO Energy Company (“PECO”) after the de-regulation of the electric market effectuated by the Electricity Generation Customer Choice and Competition Act, 66 Pa.C.S. §§ 2801-2812 (the “Act”). At its essence, this case centers on the meaning of the word “cost” as used in PURTA. PECO alleges that the plain language of PURTA indicates that the cost to be used is the cost “as shown by the books of account of a public utility.” 72 P.S. § 8101-A(4).…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thor Power Tool Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Philadelphia Housing Authority v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. PECO Energy Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. PECO Energy Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  2. Spectrum Arena Ltd. Partnership v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Schock, E., Aplt. v. City of LebanonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Spectrum Arena Ltd. Partnership v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API