Legal Opinion

Palacine Oil Co. v. Philpot

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 15, 1930No. 19388PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIFFENDAFFER, O.

This is .an action commenced by Mary Jane Philpot, a minor, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against the Palacine Oil Company, .hereinafter referred to as defendant, to recover damages for personal injuries, alleged to have been received by reason of the negligence of defendant.

The petition, in substance, alleges that defendant, among other things, is engaged in thel business of selling and distributing gasoline. and in that connection owns and maintains at various places tanks or reservoirs with pumps' connected therewith which it furnishes to its customer, the tanks…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. City of Delphi v. LoweryIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. State ex rel. TrainorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
  3. Leahy v. Standard Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Troy v. Cape Fear & Yadkin Valley RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  5. Chas. T. Derr Construction Co. v. GelruthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange v. SutfinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  2. JC Penney Company v. BarrientezSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  3. Couch v. HutchersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  4. Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  5. City of Altus v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API