Legal Opinion

Colglazier v. Colglazier

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1890No. 15,349PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From the Washington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The facts stated as the cause of action are set forth in the opinion given in this case when it was in this court for the first time. Colglazier v. Colglazier, 117 Ind. 460. It is unnecessary, therefore, to restate them.

The principal question presented on this appeal arises on *197the ruling denying the appellant’s motion for a new trial. The trial court suppressed questions and answers contained in a deposition, and the appellant insists that this ruling was erroneous.

Question 5 reads thus: “ Did you at any time reside with your father on his farm in Washington county, Indiana ? If so, state…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Pedigo v. GrimesIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Bedgood v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Ætna Life Insurance v. DemingIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Harbor v. MorganIndiana Supreme Court · 1853

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matlock v. WheelerOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Whitlock v. Consumers Gas Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API