Legal Opinion
United States v. Wells
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 16, 2016No. 16-8012PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Timothy Michael Wells appeals from his conviction following a jury trial of sexual exploitation of a child, - in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a) and (e), for which he received the mandatory minimum sentence of 180 months’ imprisonment. 1 The only issue raised by Wells is whether the jury had sufficient evidence to convict him of sexual, exploitation of a child. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C, § 1291, and we affirm. 2
I
“We review a sufficiency of the evidence challenge de novo, viewing the evidence and the reasonable inferences to be drawn…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. DostDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1986
- United States v. Edwin E. WiegandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. McKissickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. William Joseph WolfCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. MullinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. SpoorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Charles HillieCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
- United States v. DahdaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. HillieCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Tel BoamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.