Legal Opinion

United States v. Mullins

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 29, 2010No. 09-1031, 09-1091PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORSUCH, Circuit Judge.

LaDonna Mullins and Linda Edwards both owned real estate businesses in the Denver metro area. Both also entered into a scheme to defraud the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) by using false information to obtain loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”). For this, Ms. Mullins and Ms. Edwards were indicted for and convicted of wire fraud, among other things. Both now challenge their convictions, and Ms. Edwards her sentence, on multiple grounds, including on the grounds that certain counts were time-barred; that the interstate…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. United States v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. Rosales-MirandaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. KiefferCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. Michael ShenemanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API