International Union v. Marshall
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion PER CURIAM.
2Per curiam
This is the second visit of this litigation to this court. The facts and issues raised are fully set out in our prior opinion, Int’l Union, UAW v. Marshall, 584 F.2d 390 (D.C. Cir.1978) (“UAW I”). Basically, the dispute is focused on the Secretary of Labor’s choice of individual automobile assembly plants as the “appropriate subdivision[s]” in this case for purposes of making worker adjustment assistance determinations pursuant to section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974, 19 U.S.C. § 2272 (1976).1 We remand*102ed the case before because the Secretary failed to set forth his reasons…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Uaw v. F. Ray MarshallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
4Cited by4 opinions
- Skrundz v. Review Bd. of Ind. Employment SEC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace And Agricultural Implement Workers Of America, Petitioner, v. F. Ray MarshallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Priscilla Belland v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, a Federal BodyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Priscilla Belland v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, a Federal BodyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984