Legal Opinion · Dissent

Priscilla Belland v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, a Federal Body

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 3, 1984No. 83-1079Published

1DissentWald, Circuit Judge

Over 250 people, many of whom had worked in the same factory for several decades, had their monthly pension payments cut by seventy-five percent — from $6.00 to $1.50 per month for each year of service— when their employer shut down the plant at which they were employed. They brought, a claim under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), a statute that was passed in order to avoid precisely the kind of tragedy recounted here. Although there is no question that the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) was statutorily authorized to extend coverage to the appellants, it…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Peyton v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Tcherepnin v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. National Automatic Laundry and Cleaning Council v. George P. Shultz, Secretary, U. S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API