Legal Opinion
The Fidelity And Casualty Company Of New York v. Carll And Ramagosa, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 24, 1966No. 15636_1PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
365 F.2d 303
The FIDELITY AND CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK, a Corporation of the State of New York, Appellant,
v.
CARLL AND RAMAGOSA, INC., a Corporation of the State of New Jersey, Casino Pier Co., a Corporation of the State of New Jersey, David Thompson, Margaret Thompson, James Thompson, Jack Dye and Mrs. Jack (Fictitious) Dye, Appellees.
No. 15636.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued March 10, 1966.
Decided August 24, 1966.
Augustine A. Repetto, Atlantic City, N. J. (Ernest M. Curtis, Atlantic City, N. J., on the brief), Robert H. Steedle, Atlantic City, N. J., for Fidelity &…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Marino v. NevittCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
- Selmes Paul Funkhouser v. City of Newark, a Municipal Corporation of New Jersey, Defendant-Respondent, And/or the Port of New York Authority, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Carll & Ramagosa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
3Cited by1 opinion
- Reams v. Tulsa Cable Television, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979