Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Department of Labor & Industries

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 5, 2012No. 66168-0-IPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAppelwick, J.

¶1 — Morrison appeals the superior court order remanding agency action, arguing that RCW 19.28-.131’s filing fee provision violates the due process clause of the state and federal constitutions. Because his interest is solely an economic one, RCW 19.28.131’s monetary prerequisite to an appeal does not violate his due process rights. We affirm the reduction of the administrative filing fee and the reinstatement of the appeal contingent upon payment *271of that fee, and remand to the trial court for the award of the court filing fee to Morrison for prevailing below.

FACTS

¶2 In December 2008, the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United States v. KrasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Ortwein v. SchwabSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Didlake v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. In re the Guardianship of CorneliusCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Johnson v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. Curtis Johnson v. Dept. Of Fish And WildlifeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. David Hedges v. Eva Judith HedgesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API