Binford v. Young
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Fayette Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The complaint of the appellee charges the appellant with speaking and publishing of her false and slanderous words.
*175There is much in the complaint that ought not to be there, and some things should be there that are not. If it had been assailed by demurrer it might, perhaps, be our duty to declare it insufficient, but it is here attacked for the first time. An attack after verdict is governed by very different rules from those which govern attacks by demurrer. A verdict will often so aid a complaint as to prevent a successful attack, and we think the one before us is so aided.
Under our rule it…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- City of Teree Haute v. HudnutIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Elliott v. RussellIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Wolfe v. PughIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Weenig v. WoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co v. CollinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Baum v. ThomsIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Shewalter v. BergmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Dwyer v. LibertIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.