State v. Yanez
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION.
{¶ 1} The defendant-appellant, Antonio Yanez, appeals from the judgment of the trial court overruling his post-sentence motion to withdraw his plea of guilty to two counts of aggravated vehicular assault. He contends that his guilty plea was not knowingly, understandingly, and intelligently entered because the trial court, before accepting his plea, failed to personally advise him, as required by R.C. 2943.03(A), of the risk of deportation, exclusion from the country, and denial of naturalization following conviction. We agree.
{¶ 2} On November 7, 2002, with a court-appointed counsel…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1977
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. FrancisOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. BilelegneAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- State v. MadarisOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Nikolaev v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. Lucente, Unpublished Decision (3-29-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.