Legal Opinion

State v. Lucente, Unpublished Decision (3-29-2005)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 2005No. 03 MA 216UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Nino Lucente appeals from the judgment of the Mahoning County Common Pleas Court denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. The issue presented in this appeal is whether the advisement in R.C. 2843.031 was given to appellant prior to him entering a guilty plea. For the reasons stated below, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, the plea is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings.

STATEMENT OF CASE AND FACTS

{¶ 2} On June 20, 2002, appellant and his brother Salvatore Lucente, noncitizens, were secretly indicted by the Mahoning County…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. GriggsOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. BushOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. BushOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. FrancisOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. WeberOhio Court of Appeals · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Oluoch, 07ap-45 (10-18-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. State v. Ayupov, 21621 (5-11-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State v. VillavicencioOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State v. ZabalaOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API