Legal Opinion

Kellogg Co. v. F. Hoffman La Roche Ltd.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 14, 2003No. 99-197(TFH); MDL No. 1285PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

THOMAS F. HOGAN, Chief Judge.

RE: Plaintiff Kellogg Company’s Motion in Limine to Preclude the Evidence that Kellogg Passed on Any Indirect-Purchaser Overcharges

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Kellogg Company’s (“Kellogg”) Motion in Limine to exclude all evidence pertaining to any purported downstream pass through of defendants’ conspiratorial overcharges as irrelevant under the Michigan Antitrust Reform Act. Kellogg claims that evidence of any purported pass through of overcharges is irrelevant under the Michigan Antitrust Reform Act as it is neither an affirmative…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. California v. ARC America Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  5. McAuley v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Vitamins Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  2. B A Kelly Land Co L L C v. Aethon Energy Operating L L CDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API