Legal Opinion
In Re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 14, 2003No. MDL No. 1285PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
259 F.Supp.2d 1 (2003)
In Re: VITAMINS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
Kellogg Co.
v.
F. Hoffman La Roche Ltd. et al.
No. 99-197(TFH).
MDL No. 1285.
United States District Court, District of Columbia.
March 14, 2003.
Daniel S. Mason, Craig C. Corbitt, Joseph M. Bell, Sara M. Scott, Peter F.
Burns, Zelle, Hofmann, Voelbel, Mason, & Gette, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Kellogg Co.
Thomas M. Mueller, Michael 0. Ware, Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw, New York City, Philip J. Kessler, Amy K. Hunt, H. William Burdett, Jr., Butzel Long, P.C., Detroit, MI, for Lonza Inc., Lonza AG.
Peter E. Halle, Jonathan…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- California v. ARC America Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- McAuley v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Powell Prescription Center v. Surescripts, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024