Legal Opinion
Pelletier v. Sordoni
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 1, 2003No. SC 16743; SC 16747PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
In these two consolidated appeals, the plaintiffs, Norman Pelletier, and his wife, Reine Pelletier,1 appeal2 from the summary judgment of the trial court, rendered in favor of the defendants, Sordoni/ Skanska Construction Company (Sordoni) and Professional Services Industries, Inc. (Professional Services).3 *512The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly determined that neither Sordoni nor Professional Services could be held hable to the plaintiff for alleged negligence, and that Sordoni could not be held hable for breach of contract. We reverse the judgment regarding…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Gazo v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Elliott v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Water Co. v. WareSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Kolb v. BurnsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- Norwalk Gaslight Co. v. Borough of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Jagger v. Mohawk Mountain Ski Area, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Craig v. Stafford Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Archambault v. Soneco/Northeastern, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Pelletier v. Sordoni/Skanska Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Skakel v. Comm'r of Corr.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.