Legal Opinion
Mary Bradley v. Harcourt, Brace and Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 30, 1996No. 95-56003PublishedCited by 275 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TROTT, Circuit Judge:
OVERVIEW
Mary Bradley appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Hare-ourt, Brace and Company (“Harcourt”) on her claims of sex discrimination and disability discrimination. We must decide whether Bradley has produced sufficient evidence to establish a genuine factual dispute regarding: (1) whether Harcourt’s articulated justifications for her termination-poor work performance and misconduct-are pretexts for unlawful sex discrimination; ■ and (2) whether Bradley has an impairment that substantially limits her ability to work. Because we conclude…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Gary E. Wallis, Husband Carol Wallis, Wife v. J.R. Simplot CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Bagdadi v. NazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Warren A. PROUD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael P.W. STONE, Secretary of the Army, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by275 opinions
- Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Donald G. Wexler v. White's Fine Furniture, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Waterhouse v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Marsha Godwin v. Hunt Wesson, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Raymond M. Cornwell v. Electra Central Credit Union James E. SharpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
270 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.